<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great Intellicap White Paper on AP Situation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.tufts.edu/inclusivecommerceblog/2010/10/28/intellicap-white-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.tufts.edu/inclusivecommerceblog/2010/10/28/intellicap-white-paper/</link>
	<description>Hosted by the Center for Emerging Market Enterprises (CEME), The Fletcher School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 15:49:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajan Alexander</title>
		<link>http://sites.tufts.edu/inclusivecommerceblog/2010/10/28/intellicap-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajan Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.tufts.edu/inclusivecommerceblog/?p=67#comment-10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MFIs argue that they need a spread apart from all costs to provide for contingencies and growth. Fine but the moot question is how much should be this spread. 

MFIs argue that economies of scale and competition will drive interest rates down. This remains only a theoretical argument. “Mexican microfinance institutions charge such high rates simply because they can get away with it”, said Emmanuelle Javoy, the managing director of Planet Rating, an independent Paris-based firm that evaluates micro lenders!! If at all, the average Indian MFI interests rates appear more benign than in Latin America or Nigeria, then it simply because other than factors internal to the MFI industry, the sector faces strong competition from governmental and NGO SHG micro-saving programmes in the absence of which, these MFIs would have formed a cartel. Past angry public and government reactions that resulted in a backlash against them, which included the arrests of MFI top leaders, like Uday Kumar of Share Microfinance Ltd as in 2007, keeps their profiteering impulses under check. 

The sooner MFIs are seen as profit enterprises, the better. The longer they pretend they are pro-poor, the longer they discredit the NGO sector that gave birth to a Frankenstein. By 2014, they target to reach 110 million borrowers. Remarkably, despite two decades of operations, if statistics are to be believed, these MFIs only reach just 20 million people in the country, a good proportionate of them, multiple counted. Yet, they succeed in gaining an attention, so disproportionate to this miniscule reach. Act now to prevent they becoming an epidemic in the country. Act now, when they are most vulnerable. 

And how do know they are vulnerable? Because Vijay Mahajan,  the father of MFIs in India tells us so:

“We are facing collapse. Unless something changes on the ground, the industry as we know it is basically gone. ”
Mahajan, we have news for you. The day when the likes of you are gone, that will be the turning point for the fight against poverty! 


Read More: http://devconsultgroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/whats-wrong-with-micro-finance.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MFIs argue that they need a spread apart from all costs to provide for contingencies and growth. Fine but the moot question is how much should be this spread. </p>
<p>MFIs argue that economies of scale and competition will drive interest rates down. This remains only a theoretical argument. “Mexican microfinance institutions charge such high rates simply because they can get away with it”, said Emmanuelle Javoy, the managing director of Planet Rating, an independent Paris-based firm that evaluates micro lenders!! If at all, the average Indian MFI interests rates appear more benign than in Latin America or Nigeria, then it simply because other than factors internal to the MFI industry, the sector faces strong competition from governmental and NGO SHG micro-saving programmes in the absence of which, these MFIs would have formed a cartel. Past angry public and government reactions that resulted in a backlash against them, which included the arrests of MFI top leaders, like Uday Kumar of Share Microfinance Ltd as in 2007, keeps their profiteering impulses under check. </p>
<p>The sooner MFIs are seen as profit enterprises, the better. The longer they pretend they are pro-poor, the longer they discredit the NGO sector that gave birth to a Frankenstein. By 2014, they target to reach 110 million borrowers. Remarkably, despite two decades of operations, if statistics are to be believed, these MFIs only reach just 20 million people in the country, a good proportionate of them, multiple counted. Yet, they succeed in gaining an attention, so disproportionate to this miniscule reach. Act now to prevent they becoming an epidemic in the country. Act now, when they are most vulnerable. </p>
<p>And how do know they are vulnerable? Because Vijay Mahajan,  the father of MFIs in India tells us so:</p>
<p>“We are facing collapse. Unless something changes on the ground, the industry as we know it is basically gone. ”<br />
Mahajan, we have news for you. The day when the likes of you are gone, that will be the turning point for the fight against poverty! </p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://devconsultgroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/whats-wrong-with-micro-finance.html" rel="nofollow">http://devconsultgroup.blogspot.com/2010/10/whats-wrong-with-micro-finance.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
