Summer 2013

Hidden Strength

The placebo effect is stronger and more pervasive than many doctors realized

By Marjorie Howard

Previous Next

Illustration: Shout

Walter Brown had gotten over a bad bout of flu, but couldn’t get rid of his nasty cough. As it persisted over many weeks, he began to worry and called his doctor. In an upbeat and authoritative way, the doctor told Brown that coughs are normal after the flu and prescribed a cough suppressant. But if the problem continued, the doctor said, he should call back.

Brown immediately felt relieved, and the cough bothered him less throughout the day, though he says he probably coughed just as much. The reassuring words from his doctor and the feeling that he was in control, he surmised later, contributed to his improved sense of well-being.

Brown is a psychiatrist and professor who teaches at the medical school and also at Brown University. For the last 25 years, he has been studying the placebo effect, an improvement in health not attributable to active medication. In his new book, The Placebo Effect in Clinical Practice (Oxford University Press), he explores the phenomenon.

Tufts Medicine: What is the placebo effect? 

Walter Brown: It is the improvement that occurs in people who are ill in which they get everything other than a specific, active treatment. It’s a response to all the common factors of treatment, which include going to an expert, having expectations for recovery and getting access to various kinds of healing rituals. It’s the response to really everything that goes on in treatment, with the exception of an active drug. Of course, a narrow —and common— definition for a placebo effect itself, is a capsule that contains no active pharmacological agent.

How does the placebo effect work?

Expectation is probably the most widely researched mechanism of the placebo effect. In essence, when people anticipate what they’re going to experience as a result of medical treatment, that expectation has a tremendous influence on what happens. Alcohol and caffeine are the most studied substances in a lab setting, and both show that if someone thinks they are getting alcohol or coffee, they react as if they had.

With alcohol they will undergo all of the psychological and physiological changes that occur, including getting drunk. With caffeine, if someone is told he has caffeinated coffee, he has all the effects of the stimulant, including increases in alertness and decreases in reaction time, even if the coffee is decaffeinated.

The placebo effect has been shown time and time again. It’s also true in a clinical context; if someone believes he is given a pain medication or an antidepressant, he tends to experience the effect of such drugs, even if they haven’t been administered.

What else helps it work?

Conditioning is a factor. The Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov showed us that when you present a dog with food, it starts to salivate. He discovered that the salivation occurs even before the food shows up, so that when a trainer rings a bell when giving food, all it takes is the stimulus of the bell to bring on the salivation response. It also occurs with drugs. If you give rats an amphetamine-like drug that increases their activity, after a couple of injections, you can give them an injection with saltwater, and it has the same effect.

The same thing can happen with drugs. If you’ve taken a pill in the past that took your pain away, just taking a pill that looks like that first one, even if it contains no pain medication, may bring relief.

 Are there some conditions that respond better to placebos than others?

It’s worth dividing what people suffer from into illness and disease. Illness has been conceptualized as the kind of subjective discomfort that goes along with the disease—the pain, discouragement, generally lousy feeling and worry. Disease is what a doctor sees on an X-ray or a scan, such as a broken bone or a tumor. Placebos are almost invariably helpful with illness and are less likely to have an effect on actual disease progression.

There was a study a year ago that showed this very well, dealing with patients who had asthma and were given either placebos or active drugs. Those who got placebos said they felt better and their breathing was better. But it was only the actual asthma drug that showed an objective change in the state of the airways.

What are the implications?

The implications are profound. In some instances you can substitute placebos for active drugs and get the same result as from taking the active drug. This would reduce the expense of drug treatment regimens and of side effects.

Will a placebo still work if people are told that’s what they’re getting?

A lot of people think it won’t, because expectation is so important. But there have been studies that show if you tell patients openly they are getting a capsule or tablet without medicine, but that other people often improve with this kind of treatment because it may stimulate the body’s own self-healing processes, they get better.

Do doctors administer placebos?

Surveys show that well over 50 percent of doctors use them fairly regularly. What they give people is an active treatment, a vitamin or low dose of something, knowing it has no inherent therapeutic effect, but they do it because the patient wants something. They use it as a placebo, but it’s not a sugar pill. And doctors give them out inadvertently all the time. Any time a doctor gives a patient an antibiotic when they have a virus, they are basically being given a placebo.

What does current research tell us about placebos?

Because we can now take images of the brain, we can see that when people think they are being given a pain medicine, for example, they undergo some of the same brain changes that occur when an actual pain medication is prescribed. This has really changed a lot of the ways people think about placebos. In the past, it was thought that if people said they were feeling better after getting placebos, they were imagining it or telling their doctors what they thought they wanted to hear. But now you can show there are actual changes in the brain.

How do you think the medical profession should use placebos?

I think fostering the placebo effect takes time. Doctors need to spend time with patients, listen to them talk about their symptoms and go through an evaluation and prognosis. All this contributes to people feeling better, but those things take time, and doctors are under a lot of time pressure. And I think a lot of health-care providers just don’t know how to harness the placebo effect. Health professionals need to be taught about its value and how to make use of it to enhance treatment.

Marjorie Howard, a senior writer in Tufts’ Office of Publications, can be reached at marjorie.howard@tufts.edu.

 

Top Stories

The Viral Thief

Bacteria and viruses are waging a constant battle, with countless twists and turns in the fight for supremacy

Onto the Sure-Footed Path

A venturesome new program brought a talented cohort of UMass-Boston students to the medical school, expanding their personal visions of what might be

Dearly Departed

Just hired after a successful career as a funeral home director, Brian McKinney is determined to bring gross anatomy at Tufts into the 21st century

Community Health Activist

Elyse LaFond, ’15, secured a $30,000 grant for prenatal care services at Sharewood

Editor's Picks

HIV Breakthrough

Apparent cure of infant with AIDS earns alumna international acclaim

Tick, Tick, Tick

What looks like Lyme disease may be a completely different illness

What Changes and What Endures

Despite economic turbulence, medical and Sackler graduates should prevail

On Designer Babies

Genetic enhancement of human embryos is not a practice for civil societies