An interesting realization I have made on my journey as an #education researcher is how problematic it is to solely associate words with understanding.
Words are definitely valid means of communicating understanding, but words neither automatically mean understanding nor are they the only way to communicate understanding.
In fact, researchers have found that simply having words to describe things to children (and sometimes, adults also) doesn’t make them understand it.
In her book, one of my favourite Education Researchers, Prof Duckworth posited that, #Knowledge has not one, but three access routes:
1. Conceptual: The kind of knowledge that expressed itself in words, formulas and frameworks.
2. Perceptual: The kind of knowledge that is expressed itself in awareness that is mostly innate and tacit. It is the kind of knowledge that is stored in mental representations, and helps the owner compare and contrast without necessarily using words and formulas.
3. Action: The kind of knowledge that expresses itself in the ability to simply do things.
Some people are able to combine these three access routes in the journey of understanding. Some people are not. That is why there are some people who simply know something, but they have no words to express it. You probably have experienced that before.
I am curious about how we can apply this phenomenon in formal education. What will it look like if we agree that understanding cannot be reduced to conceptual frameworks only? How will our assessment of understanding (examinations, tests, etc) change if we agree that words are not the only way to show understanding?