Starvation in Venezuela

By May 2018, approximately 5,000 people per day were leaving Venezuela in search of food (for updated information on Venezuelan refugees see UNHCR). At this rate, 1.8 million people will have left by the end of 2018, joining 1.5 million who have already fled. This is over ten per cent of Venezuela’s population of 32 million.

The Mirriam-Webster dictionary defines famine as “widespread scarcity of food, caused by several factors including… government policies. This phenomenon is usually accompanied or followed by regional malnutrition, starvation, epidemic, and increased mortality.” By this definition, Venezuelans may already be experiencing famine. At the very least, they are experiencing state-induced hunger.

Hugo Chávez was elected President of Venezuela in 1999. He instituted several policies that were meant to feed poor Venezuelans, but actually made the situation worse. From 1999 to 2007 people’s living conditions improved, but food shortages started when oil prices declined. Chávez died in 2013, and was succeeded by Nicolás Maduro, whose even more draconian policies created massive food shortages.

Chávez and Maduro destroyed the market in food by imposing control prices that resulted in underproduction when the official prices did not meet costs of production. Their governments expropriated farms, ranches, and even food distributors such as butchers. There’s very little if anything produced on these expropriated territories. Food is now heavily controlled by the black market and by corrupt importers (often members of the military who are also Maduro’s cronies) who sit on food at the ports to drive up the price. By 2017 malnutrition was confirmed in Venezuela, precipitating the political unrest now roiling the country.

According to Antulio Rosales (“Weaponizing Hunger is a New Low for the Venezuelan President,” Globe and Mail, March 12, 2018, p.A11) and Enrique Krauze (“Hell of a Fiesta,” New York Review of Books, March 8, 2018, pp. 4-7), by early 2018 more than half of all Venezuelans had lost between 19 and 24 pounds, and 90 per cent said they do not have enough money for food. The minimum monthly wage in mid-2017 bought only 12 per cent of one person’s basic food needs, even less now. Sixty per cent of the population lives in extreme poverty. Formerly dormant diseases such as malaria, diphtheria and dengue are reoccurring, while hospitals are extremely short of personnel, medicines, and the most basic equipment. Some people receive subsidized food boxes, but the contents are inconsistent and insufficient, are distributed irregularly, and are more likely to go to supporters of Maduro than others.

At the same time political appointees, rather than competent managers, now run the state oil company. Failure to reinvest has meant that oil production has fallen drastically, so that Venezuela’s earnings of foreign exchange have diminished.

To keep all this going, the government has undermined the rule of law and the judiciary, and arrested independent trade union leaders. It has manipulated elections and is attempting to replace the legitimate elected legislature, where there are still some opposition members, with a “Constituent National Assembly” completely loyal to Maduro. Both Chávez and Maduro have ruled by decree and used arbitrary arrest, torture and even executions to maintain themselves in power. Maduro also controls the media: it is illegal now to post pictures of empty store shelves or images of desperation, supposedly because it foments hatred.

Rhoda Howard-Hassmann addresses issues of starvation in Venezuela at The Return of Famine conference,
sponsored by the WPF, Feinstein International Center and Tufts University on May 4, 2018.

International Mechanisms to Protect Venezuelans’ Right to Food

It’s very difficult to know what to do about the situation in Venezuela. Individual citizens have hardly any recourse to outside institutions to help them in their search for food and medicine. Citizens of some states can complain about violations of their right to food to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, but all that committee can do is make recommendations or “name and shame” rights-violating states. But even this doesn’t apply to Venezuela, which hasn’t ratified the necessary international treaty to permit its citizens to make individual complaints.

The US has imposed sanctions on some Venezuelan individuals, freezing their assets and banning travel to the US. It’s also prohibited financial dealings by US citizens with these sanctioned Venezuelans. Maduro replies to these measures by accusing the US of imperialism, a plausible accusation given its real history of imperialism in Central and South America.

There’s also been some regional pressure on Chávez and Maduro. The Organization of American States tried to persuade Chávez to change some of his policies, but he replied by withdrawing from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in 2012. Maduro has been barred from visiting some other South American countries: Peru withdrew his invitation to the 8th Summit of the Americas for April 2018.

On Feb 8, 2018 the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), which Venezuela joined in 2002, opened a preliminary investigation into alleged crimes against humanity in Venezuela, such as arbitrary detentions and torture. This followed a 2017 determination by the Organization of American States that there was evidence of such widespread crimes. The ICC Statute considers extermination via denial of food to be a crime against humanity, but the preliminary investigation did not mention this.

On May 24, 2018 the UN Security Council voted unanimously to ban the use of starvation as a weapon of war. However, Venezuela is not a war-torn state, even though there is much civil conflict there now as a result of Maduro’s starvation-inducing policies.

There is no international legal mechanism to stop perfectly predictable state-induced food shortages before they happen. Nor can any legal mechanism hold entire regimes accountable, even when all or most senior government officials are complicit in the wrong-doing. All the ICC can do, if it gets that far, is try individuals, not an entire government.

Except for committing genocide or crimes against humanity, states (or the governments of those states) still have the sovereign right to violate their citizens’ human rights. They also have the sovereign right to choose whatever “development” path a state elite wants, even if that so-called development is bound to fail and result in de-development, if not outright starvation, as in Venezuela. These states’ rights are sacrosanct, and far more important to the international “community’ than the rights of starving citizens.

The Future

For the foreseeable future, Venezuelans will try to flee in their hundreds of thousands in search of food. But they will find it increasingly difficult to do so, as both Colombia and Brazil have been cracking down on legal migration. The result is irregular migration controlled by smugglers and armed groups. Venezuelan women and girls are now trafficked across the border to satisfy the Colombian demand for sex workers. ( ).

Meantime, like the Emperor Nero fiddling while Rome burnt, Maduro continues to fiddle with the economy, arbitrarily imposing currency devaluations and insufficient wage increases, everything but permitting a free market and property rights that would encourage production and distribution of food (See “Confusion reigns as Maduro mega-devaluation roils Venezuela,” The Globe and Mail, August 20, 2019 p. B3).

On August 4, 2018 there was a drone attack on Maduro while he was giving a speech at a military parade. The question now is, whether a civil war in Venezuela will exacerbate famine even further, or whether there might be a coup by anti-Maduro factions within the military or elsewhere. If the latter, the new rulers might turn to a somewhat more rational economic policy, although they will not necessarily restore civil liberties or encourage political democracy.

For a more detailed scholarly analysis of the situation in Venezuela and what might be done about it, see my State Food Crimes, Cambridge University Press, 2016.


Tagged with:

7 Responses to Famine in Venezuela

  1. Elena Blanco says:

    Thank you so much for this thoroughly and eloquent analysis and report on the cruel and little known reality of Venezuela. I’m a co-founder and development director of a small grassroots non-profit/ non-governmental organization in the Venezuelan Andes called Fundacion Cultivar, that works to help disadvantaged children and youth to fulfil their potential through culture, environmental work, and wellness.

    I’ll be in Boston for a couple of months hoping to do some networking and figure out ways to overcome the difficulties to raise funds for our organization there. I’d love to know of any presentations/ discussions on Venezuela. Thanks a lot.

    • Rhoda Hassmann says:

      Thank you for your comments. Unfortunately, I do not live in Boston so I can’t help you with discussions on Venezuela there. I refer you to the Tufts program, Reinventing Peace, which posted this blog.

  2. Tom Collins says:

    This is a highly dubious piece of “research” and ‘infected’ throughout with US Trump administration and “opposition” elite friendly propaganda.

    For a more reasonable and thorough take on the food situation in Venezuela, I suggest the actual research, conducted by Venezuelan academics, below. Rather than take every opportunity to repeat the same US talking points over and over (such as is the case with Mrs. Hassmann’s article above), this article truly takes a holistic perspective of the so-called food crisis.

    I would like to further mention that Mrs. Hassmann is a member of the same group of Canadians who have been aiding and abetting the US’s long economic war against Venezuelan people. For further reading on this, look up “The Lima Group.”

    • Rhoda Hassmann says:

      Thank you for your comments and for the links to the two articles, which I have read with interest.

      This is not the place to address the entirety of the article in Monthly Review. I refer you to my book, State Food Crimes (Cambridge University Press, 2016); I deal with Venezuela specifically in chapter 6 and chapters 8-10). An earlier version of chapter 6 is in Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 4, 2015, pp. 1024-45.

      The article in Monthly Review acknowledges food shortages but attributes then to the actions of the capitalist elite, both historically and presently. The article is correct in pointing out that during the early Chavez years,poverty declined. However, food shortages started as early as 2007. Reports of malnourishment started in 2015.

      The article in Monthly Review also does not mention constraints on civil and political rights such as freedom of the press, on trade unions, and on political opposition under both Chavez and Maduro. These constraints prevent Venezuelans from having open discussions about why there are food shortages, and prevents them from organizing politically in their own interests. The Monthly Review article does mention violence by opponents of Maduro, but not violence bu Maduro’s (and earlier Chavez’) police forces, the military, and paramilitary units.

      Likewise, the article in Canadian Dimension does not mention any constraints on civil and political rights. Nor does it acknowledge, in February 2019, the extreme shortages of food and medicines in Venezuela, or the millions of Venezuelan refugees.

      You are right that I am not Venezuelan, but I read many sources by Venezuelans and had a Venezuelan research assistant. In any event, where a person comes from does not necessarily determine his or her position, or whether that position is accurate.

      With regard to my taking “every opportunity to repeat the same US talking points over and over”, my blog is based upon research on Venezuela that I conducted up to May 2015, long before the current US interest in Venezuela. The blog above was posted August 21, 2018, also long before the current US initiative; the video it is linked to is of a talk I delivered at Tufts University on May 4, 2018. My views are drawn from my own research and have nothing to do with the current US Administration, which I detest.

      For the record, I am strongly opposed to and worried by the US’ threats of military intervention in Venezuela. I assume that the Trump administration’s true motives are to get control of Venezuelan oil and to undermine Cuba’s influence in that country. However, while I hate to agree with Mike Pence on anything, I do think that releasing Venezuela’s frozen assets to Juan Guaido and his interim government is a good idea.

      With regard to your comment that I am “a member of the same group of Canadians who have been aiding and abetting the US…”, I am not nor have I ever been a member or employee of any Canadian government, nor has anyone connected to the Lima group contacted me about Venezuela. As the article from The Canadian Dimension that you cite shows, being a Canadian citizen and/or resident does not mean one will necessarily agree with the Lima group’s actions. I happen to do so, and I think the Lima Group is trying very hard to make sure that the US’s threatened military intervention does not take place.

      The larger point here is that if you take a human rights perspective, you judge every state and every President by the same criteria. It is possible to oppose US intervention and simultaneously hope that the Maduro government will be peacefully overthrown, as I do. Such overthrows occurred in Soviet Bloc Europe between 1989 and 1991, so they are possible. It is not necessary to attribute ideological motives to human rights scholars and activists who believe that every regime that systematically violates human rights, left or right-wing in orientation, should be criticized and if necessary, overthrown.

  3. Andres Matos says:

    This article truly reflects what is happening in Venezuela. thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.