On March 28th, the Federal Bureau of Prisons reported the first death of someone in their custody: Patrick Jones, aRead more
Published by the Journal of International Criminal Justice, in a special edition on Starvation and International Law.Read more
This new Occasional Paper by Dan Maxwell, Henry J. Leir Professor in Food Security at the Friedman School of Nutrition, Science, and Policy, is produced as part of the Conflict Research Programme.Read more
Alex de Waal analyzes the development of Sudan’s political economy and political market.Read more
‘We Have Hope’: Resilience Among Violence Affected Youth WPF Senior Fellow, Dyan Mazurana, has written a manuscript, `We Have Hope’:Read more
The Ethiopian state underwent major restructuring at the beginning of the 1990s. It replaced a once highly-centralised state with a federal system, adopting a democratic constitution, the transfer of power through elections, and the recognition of the rights associated with freedom of expression.
More specifically, the Ethiopian security sector was transformed from 1991 onwards; political changes led to a new conception of threats and security needs, and the institutional structure of the country’s security agencies was brought into alignment with the new federal arrangements. The defence review was developed in the context of this wider security sector transformation.Read more
In July 2016, the World Peace Foundation released its report, African Politics, African Peace. The most extensive review of theRead more
The presentation by Veena Das, “Techniques of Power and the Rise of the Grotesque” made me reflect on how thisRead more
The philosopher Eric Heller wrote, ‘Be careful how you interpret the world; it is like that.’ One of the challenges facing the social scientist is that a deep knowledge of a particular issue, or a particular place, allows the scholar to write about it with an authoritative subjectivity. In my own writings on Sudan, I have approached the same topic (e.g. political violence) from different perspectives, each time with some explanatory purchase. These different frameworks of explanation may be incompatible with one another, but that has not hindered me from using them.
My concluding point in this paper is therefore, that (dis)order may be in the eye of the beholder, or the pen of the writer, as much as in the world that is being observed or described. However, rather than lapsing into an irretrievable subjectivity and a resigned agnosticism, I prefer to be cautious about what can and cannot be explained, and to insist on always bearing in mind the limitations of any particular point of view.Read more