DUE DATE:
Monday, November 20th, 2017 @ 11:55pm on TRUNK
FILE NAME AND FORMAT:
Upload as two separate documents, please!
group number_last name_last name_last name_last name_PeerReview_1st group’s number
group number_last name__last name_last name_last name_PeerReview_2nd group’s number
.doc or .docx are acceptable.
Ex. “22_Fanous_Ngo_Smith_John_PeerReview_1.docx” and “22_Fanous_Ngo_Smith_John_PeerReview_2.docx”
ASSIGNMENT DESCRIPTION:
This is a group assignment, please submit one assignment for the team, with all team member names included. For group submissions, any student in the group is free to submit the assignment but it is ultimately the responsibility of the Project Manager/Editor to ensure each assignment is submitted on time.
Each group is expected to provide comments on two different groups’ rough cut videos. By providing a fresh set of eyes, each group can provide insightful commentary and constructive criticism about the organization, comprehensibility, appeal of each video.
Quality peer review is critical to making a high quality video. Not only is your group’s feedback helpful to the others, but the process of looking at two other videos will help see the strengths and weaknesses of your own group’s video. (Note: this assignment is evaluated on the quality of comments provided, not on the comments you receive.)
INSTRUCTIONS:
- You will review two group projects, the next two on the list found here. If you are Group 1, review Groups 2 and 3; If you are Group 2, review Groups 3 and 4; and so on.
- You will review two group projects, the next two on the list found here. If you are Group 1, review Groups 2 and 3; If you are Group 2, review Groups 3 and 4; and so on. If you are Group 22, review groups 23 & 1. NOTE: There is no group 18 so group 16 and 17 will need to skip 18. Please see this Excel Spreadsheet for editing assignments: Video Review Guide
- All videos were uploaded to MediaSpace and should have their designated group numbers in the file name (see instructions for uploading)
- As a group, provide general comments, larger criticisms, and other suggestions that should highlight the “big edits” the receiving group should consider. Ensure all feedback is constructive and explicit. Provide suggestions or recommendations when possible.
- Please use the following template to organize your group’s comments for easy reference by others:
Reviewing Group Number:
Reviewed Group Number:
Purpose and Factual Content:
Appealing:
Needs Improvement:
Organization:
Appealing:
Needs Improvement:
Economy of Presentation:
Appealing:
Needs Improvement:
Quality of Images:
Appealing:
Needs Improvement:
Quality of Audio:
Appealing:
Needs Improvement: