Individual Peer Review

 

DUE DATE:

Monday, November 20th, 2017 @ 11:55pm on MediaSpace

ASSIGNMENT DESCRIPTION:

This is an individual assignment. Each student is expected to use MediaSpace to provide comments on two different groups’ rough cut videos. By providing a fresh set of eyes, each student can provide insightful commentary and constructive criticism about the organization, comprehensibility, appeal of each video from their own perspective.

Quality peer review is critical to making a high quality video. Not only is your feedback helpful to the groups, but the process of looking at two other videos will help see the strengths and weaknesses of your own group’s video. (Note: this assignment is evaluated on the quality of comments provided, not on the comments you receive.)

INSTRUCTIONS:

  1. You will review two group projects, the next two on the list found here. If you are Group 1, review Groups 2 and 3; If you are Group 2, review Groups 3 and 4; and so on. If you are Group 22, review groups 23 & 1. NOTE: There is no group 18 so group 16 and 17 will need to skip 18. Please see this Excel Spreadsheet for editing assignments: Video Review Guide
  2. All videos were uploaded to MediaSpace and should have their designated group numbers in the file name (see instructions for uploading).
  3. You must provide comments on the videos that are both specific to a certain aspect or moment (small edits) and broad to address issues of structure, science, or style (big edits). In all cases, consider comments that would be useful for the groups to hear, that can be acted upon or duly noted.