Guatemala City, Guatemala
Los Angeles, CA (Huntington Beach)
Mexico City, Mexico
New Delhi, India
New York, NY
Phonm Penh, Cambodia
Prague, Czech Republic
San Diego, CA
San Francisco, CA
Salt Lake City, UT
Seoul, South Korea
Tel Aviv, Israel
Well, we’re down to the final hours, my friends. Though hundreds of you have submitted the applications that already are keeping us busy, an even greater number have applications that, whether complete or not, have not been submitted. If you’re one of those down-to-the-wire people, holding until as close as possible to 11:59 p.m. EST (UTC-5) tonight, be sure to keep your eye on the clock.
Remember that, to meet the deadline, you need to submit all the parts of the application that you control. DO NOT hold your application for recommenders or for test scores. (On the other hand, do make sure your recommenders are well aware of the deadline.) If you are still waiting for an official transcript to arrive so that you can upload a copy, send us whatever you have now, and send the official version when you receive it.
Remember to proofread your essays and double check that you have answered all the questions. And then…click submit, take a deep breath, and settle in for a ten-week wait.
We’re all back in the office for the first time in 2017 and, aside from catching up on our own stuff, the order of the day is answering questions that have been arriving by email and phone. Cindy, one of our graduate assistants, is doing much of this work for us. Most of her answers (the part of the conversation that I can hear) amount to: Submit your application on time and you’ll be fine, so long as that test score, recommendation, or whatever, arrives shortly after the deadline. I expect the flow of these questions to continue through today and tomorrow.
Please remember that the deadline is tomorrow, January 10, at 11:59 p.m. EST (UTC -5).
We’re at that point in the year where our focus is squarely on current applicants for September 2017 enrollment — though we’re also looking forward to meeting our newest Januarians next week — and it can be easy to forget that lots of applicants are just starting their research into graduate school options. Some time back, Laurie gave a presentation to undergraduates and suggested that future applicants should plan on a one-year application preparation timeline — 18 months if possible. We know well that many people follow a much more compressed timeline, but that doesn’t mean that the early preparation wouldn’t be preferable for most. To help out the (admittedly few) blog readers who may be planning September 2018 enrollment, I’d like to share Laurie’s suggested application timeline. Here’s how she suggested organizing the different tasks ahead of someone new to the process.
One year in advance:
- Start researching schools.
- Begin to track application deadlines and requirements. (Build a spreadsheet.)
- Investigate external scholarship opportunities.
- Prepare and register for standardized testing.
Nine months in advance:
- Continue school research.
- Have your academic records translated if necessary.
- Take standardized tests — be sure to list schools where you want the results sent.
- Start thinking about potential recommenders, especially if you haven’t stayed in contact with professors from your undergraduate program.
- Compile notes to be used as the basis of your essays and personal statements.
- Apply to outside scholarships.
Six months in advance:
- Update and clean up your résumé.
- Retake standardized tests if necessary.
- Prepare a general statement of purpose to be shared with your recommenders.
- Finalize the list of schools you will be applying to.
- Create a financial plan.
Three months in advance:
- Start filling out applications.
- Finalize your essays and personal statements. (Proofread!)
- Contact your potential recommenders. (Provide them with your resume and statement of purpose.)
One month before the application deadline:
- Finalize applications for admission and scholarships.
- Check in with your recommenders.
- Submit your applications before the deadlines. (Waiting to the last minute will be stressful!)
After application submission: Continue to learn about the schools you applied to.
That last point, of course, pertains to those of you who are applying this year! Don’t wait until April to do your research.
We’re closing in on the last minutes before the January 10 deadline, but I might as well offer one last thought on application essays.
During our review of Early Notification applications, a few discussions returned to a similar theme — first put in words by Dan — that U.S. students have their undergraduate application process in mind when they write their essays, and they try too hard to “be unique.” Working with high school students, as I occasionally do, I’ve always lamented that they sit down to write their essays with that impossible standard as their instruction. Generally speaking, what does a 17-year-old know about being unique?
Fletcher applicants usually have a better sense of the world out there, but the “be unique” advice still doesn’t serve them well. It occasionally leads to an essay with strange choice of content or an odd tone. And it’s completely unnecessary. The first essay should lay out in pretty plain terms what you hope to do at Fletcher and beyond. The second essay offers a little more latitude for “uniqueness,” but you don’t need to bear that heavy burden when you think about what to write. Instead, focus on a much more achievable objective: follow the directions.
The fact is that what impresses Admissions readers is a clear study/career plan, backed as necessary by prior experience. Sure, we enjoy a heart-warming second essay, but there are many aspects of your background that you might want to share, and they aren’t all heart-warming. And that’s fine! Pick the topic that’s best for you, without trying to guess whether we’ve ever read an essay like that before.
In sum, be direct. Don’t worry about being unique. And use a thesaurus judiciously — don’t try to impress us with big words. Follow those simple instructions, and your essays will make the case for you.
Tagged with: Essays
It has been a while since I last wrote about my friend and Fletcher grad, Charles Scott, F94. After a relatively typical post-Fletcher career, Charlie relaunched himself in recent years as the “Family Adventure Guy” and a speaker for corporate and other settings.
Most noteworthy among Charlie’s recent activities have been as a member of “Team See Possibilities,” three super-fit runners who accompany a fourth — who happens to have lost his sight as an adult — on daunting adventures. In November, the Team tackled Mount Kilimanjaro. At night. Their “Kili in the Dark” run took them up the mountain at high speed, and their days in Tanzania and Kenya included visits to schools and other activities to support children who are blind.
This wasn’t their first inspiring trip, though. About a year ago, the team climbed Machu Picchu, and before that they ran the Grand Canyon rim-to-rim-to-rim.
International adventure wasn’t new to Charlie, whose pursuit of demanding travel started with a trip by bicycle around Japan with his son. Then a trip around Iceland with his son and daughter. These and other rides have linked him to a community of bicyclists and even a bike travel film festival, which has featured films that Charlie made of his travels. Take a look at a clip of a recent video called “Perceived Limits.”
Adventurers are a new, or newly prominent, subset of the Fletcher student and alumni community. Fletcher is a place where just about everyone has experienced wanderlust, even if not all of our travel is the super rugged variety. I’ll need to catch up with Charlie soon to find out what’s next in the plans for Team See Possibilities.
Tagged with: adventure
Hey there friends. I’m here for my annual sisyphean task of imploring you to avoid being among the zillion applicants who submit their applications on the January 10 deadline.
Sure, you don’t want to send us an application before it reaches its optimal state. I get that. But twelve days remain between you and the deadline, which is plenty of time to organize yourself to submit the pieces of the application under your control (i.e. not your recommendations) before the last minute. If you were to click submit before we arrive for work on Friday, January 6, you would know by the end of the day what pieces of your application (if any) are missing. Awesome, right? On the other hand, if you submit your application in the seconds before the deadline of 11:59 p.m. EST (UTC -5) on January 10, you will wait in line until we have a chance to review your application.
There it is, my best advice for you. Go ahead and listen to me. Submit early and relax, deservedly smug in the knowledge that plenty of others will be stressing.
Students have been sharing their stories on the blog for quite a while now, but this is the first year when one of the writers pursued an exchange semester. Ever-intrepid Tatsuo spent the fall at Sciences Po in Paris.
In the third semester of my MALD study, I decided to join an exchange program in Paris. I wanted to study international relations from another viewpoint, though I know that Fletcher and the hills of Medford/Somerville are the best place in the world to study.
I spent my semester at the Paris School of International Affairs at Sciences Po. Sciences Po is one of the best schools for politics and international relations in Europe. It was founded in 1872 just after Franco-Prussian War. French elites were shocked by their country’s defeat and also impressed by the power of Prussia, and they faced the need to change their education system. Sciences Po was the result of the effort to improve French practical education, based on the philosophy of political realism. The symbol of the school, the fox and lion, originated from Machiavelli’s phrase “be smart as a fox and be strong as a lion,” and shows what the founders felt they needed.
At Sciences Po, I took five courses — Grand Strategy in Diplomacy, Past and Present; Building Long-Term Relationships and Sharing Value with Stakeholders; Political Speechwriting; African Key Economic Issues; and Economics and Globalization — to earn four Fletcher credits, and I audited two more courses, Japanese Politics and International Relations; and French A1 (elementary French).
All the courses I took, except French A1, were taught in English; thus, the basic materials and styles were not so different from what I encountered at Fletcher, but there were still some interesting differences between a French (or European) school and an American school.
For diplomatic issues, I took a grand strategy course, mainly focusing on security strategies, taught by the former minister of foreign affairs of Costa Rica. In the course, and in other discussions of diplomatic topics, people mainly followed realism — based on basic political realism theory and great figures like Machiavelli, Clausewitz, and Bismarck who I “met” in the U.S. However, the “realism” I studied in Paris was a little different from what I learned in the United States. In discussions I had at Fletcher and other places in the U.S., people argued the survival of the state must outweigh all other concerns. Thus, there were many options that could be taken, including unlawful or unethical means. Additionally, the strategies for security tend to justify unilateral actions. On the other hand, the discussions in Paris I faced tended to exclude such unlawful, unethical, or unilateral options, intentionally or unintentionally.
On development issues, French development studies consider the historic background of developing areas, while American studies mainly focus on the current situation. Sometimes, French professors’ attitudes looked more emotional than rational. On the other hand, these attitudes or analyses brought me a deeper understanding of the regions and the people to be developed. Additionally, these attitudes were understandable and maybe useful for me, a Japanese development officer, because we also have complex historical backgrounds with the Asian countries we once occupied.
One of the most interesting courses in Paris was Political Speechwriting. In the French school, theoretical studies seemed to be the majority, while American professional schools like case studies. Even in the practical course for speechwriting, the professor took a lot of time to introduce many theories of Greek and Roman rhetoric. When I took the course, it was the very interesting time after Brexit. In that context, the professor analyzed American presidential debates and shared his concerns about the French presidential election coming up next spring. Through the course, I realized the great advantage of theoretical studies. At that time, most American (and global) media criticized Trump’s speeches and judged Clinton to be the winner of the debates. On the other hand, the professor evaluated Trump’s speeches in terms of their technical rhetoric while many people, including me, tended to analyze the speeches based on their content. The result of the election proved the advantage of objective/unbiased analysis based on theoretical studies.
Generally, my semester was a great opportunity to learn a lot regarding the different perspectives of the U.S. and Europe. In Japan, we tend to think of “the West” as a single actor and a single set of values. In the U.S., we tend to think of the American standard as the global standard. The three months in Paris gave me the background knowledge to avoid such misunderstandings.
It was surely true that everything went well in Paris. But I missed the family atmosphere at Fletcher, including its flexible and warm administrative offices and the close connections between students and faculty. I also missed the great academic resources around Boston. And I also love the comfortable hilltop more than the crowded buildings filled by thousands of students in the small campus in the middle of Paris.
In the end, the three-month exchange program was both long enough and short enough for me, even if it was too short to learn French, to explore Paris and other areas of France and Europe, and to enjoy the great food and drink culture.
EIB (Economics and International Business):
DHP (Diplomacy, History, and Politics):
ILO (International Law and Organizations):
Tagged with: Faculty Spotlight
The Admissions Office (along with the rest of Tufts University) is closed today. For your application question planning pleasure, please note that the office will be closed on these dates:
Friday, December 23 (today)
Monday, December 26
Friday, December 30
Monday, January 2
In addition, note that the staff will be meeting away from the office on Monday, January 9. We expect to have one of our graduate assistants available to answer last minute pre-deadline questions by phone or email.
Happy holidays to everyone!
Final exams officially end today, but students have been heading off for winter break since before last weekend. Curious about where folks are traveling? Our Coffee Hour list gives you a good indication. And also an invitation! If you will be in one of the cities on the list, you’re invited to join a Fletcher student or recent alum for conversation over your preferred hot beverage.
Details are still being finalized for some locations, but we hope you’ll plan on joining us if you can. Register from the website for coffee in any of these cities.
Tagged with: Coffee Hours
Archives by Date
TagsApplication Boston Boston Marathon Business competitions Capstone Career CIERP Coffee Hours Commencement Community Conferences Cool stuff! deadlines Dean Stavridis Dear Ariel decisions Diane DME Early Notification Essays Faculty Spotlight First-Year Alumni Five-Year Updates Fletcher Forum Ginn Library GRE IBGC Internships Interviews ISSP Liam MIB OCS On the road Outside the classroom Paying for Grad School PhD Professors suggest Recommendations Roxanne Social List Student Stories thesis waitlist World Peace Foundation